610-981-6000

Posts Tagged ‘Conundrum’

Keeping Fertility Treatments and Vacations Separate

Friday, September 24th, 2010

Call it “fertility tourism” or “reproductive tourism” if you like… but don’t take it lightly.  That moniker might make traveling to a foreign country for fertility treatments sound chic, but the results can be anything but.

Recently, clinics around the world (especially those in Europe, the Middle East and North America) have been raising flags of concern over the increase in individuals and couples who are willing to travel great distances to get fertility treatments

Some go because they think they’ll save money; some go because they are deemed too old to get fertility treatments in their country of origin; some travel because they are denied access to get fertility treatments in their homelands; and some simply want to work with physicians who won’t ask the tough questions that need to be asked.  Whatever their reasons, it’s becoming a bigger and bigger concern.

The problem isn’t that people are exercising their freedom to go wherever they choose; that’s perfectly acceptable.  The conundrum is that they are doing it for the wrong reasons.  And they’re putting their health — and the health of any child(ren) conceived through fertility treatments they get abroad — at potential risk.

It’s important to always weigh your options when it comes to choosing a fertility treatment provider and not take any aspect of the journey lightly.  If you’re tempted to go overseas, you may simply need to get a second, third or even fourth opinion at home. 

  • RSI… helping miracles happen.
  • Join RSI on Twitter.
  • Ohio Supreme Court Rules Employee Pregnancy Can Legally Lead to Firing

    Monday, June 28th, 2010

    If you’re a woman in Ohio and you’ve just signed on with an employer, you might want to hesitate before starting IVF treatments.  That’s because the Ohio Supreme Court ruled last week (in a 5-1 vote) that employers are within their rights to fire a relatively newly hired female who becomes pregnant.

    Though many would sound the alarm that this ruling is discriminatory, the Court decided that it’s up to a company to figure out if maternity leave (or leave for pregnancy-related concerns) constitutes a firing. 

    From the Court’s point of view, if an employee is generally not allowed to take an extended leave of absence (as would occur with a pregnancy) until a certain time has passed (say, a year), then the pregnant employee could be terminated.

    It’s a strange conundrum.  On the one hand, the Court’s ruling could be seen as protecting the interests of employers.  On the other hand, it gives women who want to become pregnant a reason to pause before seeking fertility treatments and medical attention for infertility lest they become jobless.

    We’d love to know your thoughts on the matter…  Both employees and employers are encouraged to chime in.

  • RSI… helping miracles happen.
  • Join RSI on Twitter.